Press Release: Lyall Bay Wastewater.
For immediate release:
The Surfbreak Protection Society (SPS) is deeply disturbed with yet another wastewater overflow event on Wellington’s south coast (Feb 3rd –Feb 5th).
Wellington City Council’s position is that: “Generally speaking 48 hours after heavy rainfall it’s usually wise to avoid swimming in the harbour or swimming around the south coast.” This is simply not good enough, considering the optimal time for surfing is generally directly after a storm/rainfall event.
The release of contaminated water is in breach of the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement (released 3rd December 2010) in relation to the use and enjoyment of surf breaks.
In 2010 The Wgtn Surfriders Club (now dissolved) consulted with and submitted on a Wellington City Council resource consent application to continue to discharge storm water and occasionally contaminated storm water (untreated wastewater from constructed overflows into the storm water system) directly into Wellington city’s coastal waters, including Lyall Bay and the south coast.
On the 18th February 2011 the Hearing Panel acting for the Greater Wellington Regional Council released their decision on a 3 stage approach to resolving storm water and wastewater connections and associated overflow events.
The panel acknowledged the significant costs of the works to resolve these overflow events, a fact that was affirmed to the submitters often by the city council during the pre-hearing process as a reason that the council could not afford to give the project the operational urgency and priority it deserves.
SPS questions how the Wellington City council can prioritise an $8 million subsidy for Singapore Airlines to run an uneconomic flight route to Singapore, a $5 million consent application subsidy to WIAL for an airport extension with a minimum donation of $90 million required for the project, while Wellington ratepayers and tourists to the capital should avoid surfing and swimming in our filthy coastal waters?
The 2011 decision on storm water/wastewater overflows facilitates the opportunity to review the consent conditions under section 128 of the RMA at any time within 3 months of the 30th of June every year.
SPS request that the Greater Wellington Regional Council undertake such a review with regard to the oversight of the hearings panel to fully assess the implications of the NZCPS released just two months prior, particularly in relation to the public’s use and enjoyment of the city’s surf breaks.
SPS are disappointed that a promised real time event warning system promised to surfers during consultation on the consents never eventuated (through no fault of Paul Glennie).
For more information:
Sign up for The Surfbreak Monthly Newsletter
Feb 8, 2017
Press release: Another contaminated storm water overflow event at Lyall Bay, and Wellington City Council’s advice is:
“Generally speaking 48 hours after heavy rainfall it’s usually wise to avoid swimming in the harbour or swimming around the south coast.”
This is simply not good enough! In 2010 Wellington City Council gave us a promise that they prioritise works to resolve this unpleasant situation for beach goers. It seams that now the priority is a generous donation of more than $90 million to Infratil shareholders to build an airport extension that will do further harm to Lyall Bay’s surfbreaks. SPS are requesting Greater Wellington Regional Council review the consents granted in 2011 to allow WCC to continue discharges for another ten years in light of the consents are in breach of the New Zealand Coastal policy Statement 2010 in regard to the use and enjoyment of surf breaksread article
Nov 21, 2016
The Surfbreak Protection Society is urging other Wellington surfers who made submissions on the proposed extension to file their form under section 274 stating they would like to appear in the Environment Court and speak to their submissions. If you have not made a submission, SPS will consider tabling a witnessed affidavit to the Court on your behalf..read article
Sep 30, 2016
SPS has put three questions to the 40 mayoral and council candidates regarding WIAL’s all out assault on the Corner surf break and whether or not they support WIAL seeking the Corner’s removal for the sake of their seawall and extension. The questions we put were:
1. WIAL are seeking to remove the Corner surf break from the proposed Natural Resources Plan so they can build a new seawall and promenade along Moa Point Rd. WIAL will need the support of WCC. If elected, will you support the removal of the Corner surf break for this project?
2.Do you think it for the public good that Lyall Bay should suffer degraded surfing conditions, the demise of the Corner and Airport Rights surf breaks, for the sake of an airport extension and new promenade?
3. Do you think WIAL should be obligated to rectify the damage to the Corner’s surfing wave quality, that they have caused over the last six to fifteen years?
So far we have had 13 candidates respond
If candidates do not respond by Sunday 1st of October SPS will take that as a “no comment”read article
Sep 24, 2016
DUDE! WHERES MY SURF BREAK?
– WIAL Telling Porkies –
A significant number of surfers are confused as to what WIAL is offering as mitigation to offset the impacts on Lyall Bay’s surf breaks,
Some surfers even think that WIAL will avoid any adverse effects on the Corner! Nothing could be further from the truth.
WIAL are embarking on a campaign to eliminate the the Corner surf break conclusively from any protection that the GWRC Proposed Natural Resources Plan offers, WIAL thinks this level of protection is unwarranted, and adverse effects on Lyall Bay’s surf breaks should only be managed as an amenity value, essentially removing any recognition of surf breaks as a finite resource from the discussion .
WIAL are even seeking to remove any controls over limiting the airport company’s ability to modify the Moa Point Rd Seawall, removing rules that would take into consideration impacts from seawall construction on our Corner surf break, as the airport company plans to build a new replacement seawall along Moa Point Rd.
WIAL simply want the Corner gone, and the Surfbreak Protection Society is the thin blue line that remains in their way.read article
Aug 7, 2016
Revelations emerged last week that Wellington International Airport Ltd (WIAL) has been responsible for alterations to the Moa Point Rd sea wall in Lyall Bay, Wellington. Michael Gunson, Research Officer at Surfbreak Protection Society (SPS) and long-time Wellington surfer, is asking why has the airport been in charge of developing the Moa Point Road sea wall, and not the Wellington City Council? The incremental creep of the sea wall has had a negative impact on Wellington’s premier Lyall Bay Corner surf break, WIAL are also applying for consents to build a 3 meter wide promenade the length of Moa Point Rd, as well as seeking the “Corner surf break’s deletion, from a GWRC schedule of regionally significant surf breaks.read article
Jul 30, 2016
The Corner surf break will be gone by Lunchtime, should the airport consent applications be successful. Points for your submission on the Proposed Wellington airport extension and Submerged Wave Focussing Structure can be found here as well as links to fill in your submission online. Wellington surfers must object to any further development of Moa Point Road Sea Wall to facilitate an extended promenade for cycling and walking, and overall sub standard mitigation for surfing that will not workread article